Quick grammar question
Aug. 22nd, 2010 12:04 pmSo I'm writing Stargate, and there's a lot of military people, which involves a lot of military forms of address, and I can't seem to keep it consistent. I tried searching google, but I keep getting conflicting answers. So, how does the rules of capitalization work?
Eg.
"Reporting for duty, sir!" said the cadet. - is the "sir" supposed to be capitalized?
"He's reporting for duty, General," said the aide. - is the "General" part supposed to be capitalized?
"Did the colonel say we could shoot?" said the guard. - I'm guessing the "colonel" in this case is not capitalized, right?
Eg.
"Reporting for duty, sir!" said the cadet. - is the "sir" supposed to be capitalized?
"He's reporting for duty, General," said the aide. - is the "General" part supposed to be capitalized?
"Did the colonel say we could shoot?" said the guard. - I'm guessing the "colonel" in this case is not capitalized, right?
(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-23 12:45 am (UTC)Military ranks are used the same way titles are used, that is capitalized when used in with a name ("General Patton", "Colonel Sanders") or when used as a direct address ("You are dismissed, Lieutenant"), but not capitalized when used as a description ("I think the captain just lost it.")
Capitalization rules from Grammar Book. (http://www.grammarbook.com/punctuation/capital.asp)
(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-23 12:55 am (UTC)Second example: ''General'' part is correctly capitalized as it is being used in lieu of a name (a subordinate officer is not supposed to address his superior or commanding officer by his first name).
Third example: No capitalization in this context.