![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
tanithryudo...even if I hardly post there on the board. (Yay for shadow-modding.)
Buncha idiots tried to argue that the fact that a banned person sees a "you don't have permission to access this page/site" page when they try to log in still indicates that the server recognizes them... as fitting under the criteria for being "a member of the boards"... in order to be eligible for the Citizen of the Month election.
...
Yeah. -_-
Well, these are Slayven fans. Why am I not surprised? *rolleyes*
...
Though I'm rather amused by the fact that the mods spelled it out in the rules on the first page that "you *must* be a current member of CBR at the time of this election... blah blah eligible to vote and be voted for blah" ... and that "no off topic-ness allowed on this thread". And yet... people are still blaming the mods for being so goshdarn ambiguous in our rules, and so goshdarn facist in deleting off topic quibbling about voting for someone's who's banned.
Check that. The idiocy probably starts with the fact that they even thought of voting for a *banned* person, and then turned around and insisted that it wasn't some kind of idiotic protest against the banning, but an actual legitimate vote in the election. *gag*
Buncha idiots tried to argue that the fact that a banned person sees a "you don't have permission to access this page/site" page when they try to log in still indicates that the server recognizes them... as fitting under the criteria for being "a member of the boards"... in order to be eligible for the Citizen of the Month election.
...
Yeah. -_-
Well, these are Slayven fans. Why am I not surprised? *rolleyes*
...
Though I'm rather amused by the fact that the mods spelled it out in the rules on the first page that "you *must* be a current member of CBR at the time of this election... blah blah eligible to vote and be voted for blah" ... and that "no off topic-ness allowed on this thread". And yet... people are still blaming the mods for being so goshdarn ambiguous in our rules, and so goshdarn facist in deleting off topic quibbling about voting for someone's who's banned.
Check that. The idiocy probably starts with the fact that they even thought of voting for a *banned* person, and then turned around and insisted that it wasn't some kind of idiotic protest against the banning, but an actual legitimate vote in the election. *gag*
