I feel sick after reading this.
May. 23rd, 2004 12:29 amScary, scary stuff.
The cites of actual source material is one thing. I'll even pass on the interpretations, even though I think they're very biased and definitely don't show or attempt to refute the opposing side of the argument.
But the conclusions? Sounds like a bunch of Aryan supremacists and homophobes.
I mean, geez... "the socially corrosive and depraved aberrations of homosexuality and pederasty"? "...currently a concerted effort on the part of American Zionists, their toadying politicians, and corporate internationalists to feminize White men of European descent"? "the malevolent myths of "diversity" and "multiculturalism" are exposed as the propagandistic, power-grabbing lies some of us have been warning about"?
Scary, scary stuff... I need a horror icon, dangit.
Addendum: Huh. Well here's another view on the issues. Well, the issues regarding homosexuality anyhow. While it doesn't have as many direct quotations, I think it does a much better job of representing an even-sided argument and at interpretation of the evidence. Amazing at how some of the same source literatures as the first link can produce diametrically opposing conclusions, eh?
The cites of actual source material is one thing. I'll even pass on the interpretations, even though I think they're very biased and definitely don't show or attempt to refute the opposing side of the argument.
But the conclusions? Sounds like a bunch of Aryan supremacists and homophobes.
I mean, geez... "the socially corrosive and depraved aberrations of homosexuality and pederasty"? "...currently a concerted effort on the part of American Zionists, their toadying politicians, and corporate internationalists to feminize White men of European descent"? "the malevolent myths of "diversity" and "multiculturalism" are exposed as the propagandistic, power-grabbing lies some of us have been warning about"?
Scary, scary stuff... I need a horror icon, dangit.
Addendum: Huh. Well here's another view on the issues. Well, the issues regarding homosexuality anyhow. While it doesn't have as many direct quotations, I think it does a much better job of representing an even-sided argument and at interpretation of the evidence. Amazing at how some of the same source literatures as the first link can produce diametrically opposing conclusions, eh?